Dreaming of EDA

by John J. Smith on Wednesday August 05th, 2015 08:40 PM

I've been thinking about what makes the hardware design process so difficult. It's no secret that getting a PCB designed and out the door takes far longer than a software design of comparable complexity. I've come to a conclusion about this... Hardware design tools are still in the stone age.

A bold statement, of course, but I can back it up. I can sum it up with a few bullet points:

Of all these shortcomings, I believe that the last one is the worst. The technology to create circuit libraries (read that carefully... circuit libraries, not component libraries, not schematic pages) has existed for many years now. I simply don't understand why it hasn't been done yet.

Dream with me a little here. Imagine a tool that will allow you to design a circuit (say, a complex buck regulator circuit). This circuit has all of the component libraries complete, the schematic is complete and reviewed, the traces are all laid out, the BOM is solid (including alternate part numbers and links to update prices), and best of all, it is fully tested. Lets say that you used it before with excellent results.

Now here's the dream part: Imagine you can just pull that entire circuit in from a menu and drop it into your next design. All of it. Schematic, PCB layout, BOM, current prices... and it's already been tested. The circuit just melts into your new design... job well done.

Now let's dream a little more. This circuit is capable of many different input and output configurations with exactly the same layout. The only thing it needs is recalculation of a half-dozen resistor and capacitor values. So... you pop up an options dialog for the circuit and it contains a form with lots of entries. You change a few of the parameters, hit re-calculate, and all of the values update automatically. Re-design done.

Yeah... but this is all just a dream, right? The technology for this doesn't exist, does it? Well, why not?

The technology for doing all of this in software has existed for decades. The computing power and storage facilities for doing this in hardware have existed for at least 10 years. Just why hasn't it been done? I can't really answer that question for certain. I can see why the current big names haven't done it: too much legacy code to lose, and a little architectural sclerosis. However, I cannot understand why nobody has created a small skunkworks shop to address the problem. Hmmm... stay tuned... I have an idea.

There are no comments yet

Add Your Comment

Note: This is an anonymous comment page, so we've taken drastic measures to eliminate spamments. Any comment that looks like it contains a link (href=[anything]) or a URL ([anything]://[anything]) will be shunted to a secondary page, where you will have the opportunity to remove the unallowed text.

General references to web sites or pages that would not result in an SEO-friendly link (i.e. www.example.com/index) are allowable. All tags will be automatically stripped

Name (optional) :

Email (optional, not publicly displayed, but available to post author for offline discussion):